Today's Articles

  • Reboxetine according to patients

    Question:

    > Has anyone had Reboxetine work for them?  I think that drug has the > poorest record for efficacy among depressed patients (but seemingly > not with psychiatrists).  And Desipramine is practically the same > thing as reboxetine–just with a high toxicity rate in overdose.

    I hate reboxetine but maybe that’s just me. (I’m not depressed either) I’d be happy to send you some, it’s fairly cheap. M99

    Response:

    Jeez! Here’s a classic example of how misinformation spreads. Let’s all be careful what we accept as fact. The following exchange from the two previous postings on this thread: << > Has anyone had Reboxetine work for them?  I think that drug has the > poorest record for efficacy among depressed patients (but seemingly > not with psychiatrists).  And Desipramine is practically the same > thing as reboxetine–just with a high toxicity rate in overdose.

    I hate reboxetine but maybe that’s just me. (I’m not depressed either) >> I think it was I who …long ago… conjectured that reboxetine MIGHT prove to be a good med for those of us who respond well to desipramine, since both drugs retard reuptake of norepinephrine ( called noradrenaline in G.B.). As many of you know, desipramine is STILL, after many years on the market …it’s an "older tricyclic… considered to be a very effective antidepressant. It is true that an overdose of it can kill and for some people the side-effects (overheating, constipation, sun hypersensitivity, suicidal tendencies, etc) make it a poor candidate for a doctor to prescribe, but it does NOT have a poor track record in alleviating depression. On the contrary, it has one of the best, which is why it’s still used. Living in the United States, I have NO experience using reboxetine, but I wanted to try it. But obviously if despramine is "practically the same thing" as reboxetine, as the previous poster stated, it is either a good antidepressant or the poster knows not whereof he speaks… Isn’t this obvious logic, everyone?

    Response:

            In rereading my last post, I apologize for the rant. The bottom line is this: As we all know, different ADs work totally differently for different people. It seems that PERHAPS different ones of us have different causes, chemically speaking, for our own particular depression.         Some people here, like myself, have had satisfactory relief from depression ONLY with desipramine, but would gladly change to another newer med if it had less of its side-effects and worked as well. I’d be interested to know how THIS SPECIFIC sub-group responds to reboxetine…. even tho’ the question is moot as we will never get it here in the US since companies here seem to be more interested in having new patents on their own propriatary chemicals.

    Response:

    > In rereading my last post, I apologize for the rant. The bottom line is this: > As we all know, different ADs work totally differently for different people. It > seems that PERHAPS different ones of us have different causes, chemically > speaking, for our own particular depression. >    Some people here, like myself, have had satisfactory relief from depression > ONLY with desipramine, but would gladly change to another newer med if it had > less of its side-effects and worked as well. I’d be interested to know how THIS > SPECIFIC sub-group responds to reboxetine…. even tho’ the question is moot as > we will never get it here in the US since companies here seem to be more > interested in having new patents on their own propriatary chemicals.

     Desipramine and rebox are similiar in that they both increase norepinephrine. I take a small dose of desipmramie to combat sedation from remeron. It really helps alot, and i get a nice tingly feeling throughout my body. But if i increase dosage, my anxiety and heart rate increase.  I would suspect if someone is suffering from depression and anxiety, i would not suggest an SNRI (desipr and rebox) unless used in combo with a sedation medication. geno

    Response:

    Reboxetine is precribed in the US now?  I remember a few years ago when i ordered some overseas.  I haven’t really tried in a while, but i remember getting a good buzz from it, and it did make me feel better in the short term.  I believe from what i’ve read its a selective, clean med.  On another note i’ve ordered Tianeptine overseas, to try again, in trial with the vit/supp I take.  Its just so expensive (aren’t they all) $60 for 60 pills.  I wish the FDA would get it approved for prescription.  Damn the man, I mean the currupt big brother. -Just an average Joe.

    Response:

    Has anyone had Reboxetine work for them?  I think that drug has the poorest record for efficacy among depressed patients (but seemingly not with psychiatrists).  And Desipramine is practically the same thing as reboxetine–just with a high toxicity rate in overdose.

    Response:

    Ya, I gave it a try.  It’s a solid antidepressant.  I tried it to augment my Luvox to try to deal with residual depressive symptoms (most notably lack of energy).  Instead what I experienced was slightly greater resilience to stress and improvement in my comorbid attention-deficit (non-hyperactive) symptoms.  However, reboxetine did not help me at all with my major problem of low energy.  So I stopped it to make room (as it were) to try augmenting with something else. Sodah

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Has anyone had Reboxetine work for them?  I think that drug has the > poorest record for efficacy among depressed patients (but seemingly > not with psychiatrists).  And Desipramine is practically the same > thing as reboxetine–just with a high toxicity rate in overdose.

    Response:


  • jackplates

    Question:

    I`m looking for a good manual jackplate for my 1988 Ranger360-v I`m trying to get better hole-shots and top end speed.what do you guys think I should buy?

    Response:

    Are you drag racing with this thing or trying to get the inland dolphins to run in the bow wave? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I`m looking for a good manual jackplate for my 1988 Ranger360-v I`m > trying to get better hole-shots and top end speed.what do you guys think > I should buy?

    Response:

    Why would you want a manual jackplate?  The advantage of an adjustable jackplate is it allows you to lift the motor so it misses the bottom when running at top speed through shallow water. —    Go Fishing.  And may your fish be as big as your tales.    Columbia, SC  Lake Murray

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I`m looking for a good manual jackplate for my 1988 Ranger360-v I`m > trying to get better hole-shots and top end speed.what do you guys think > I should buy?

    Response:

    > I`m looking for a good manual jackplate for my 1988 Ranger360-v I`m > trying to get better hole-shots and top end speed.what do you guys think > I should buy?

    Bucky,    I personally don’t like jackplates. A lot of folks run them but it seems I am always seeing someone with one broken. I talked with one guy in Memphis who told me of his jackplate breaking and his engine came off at wide open. The engine was being held by only the cables and it circled above him 3 times before it finally went in the drink. Not a picture I like to think of. Every tournament I go to someone has a jackplate being fixed. I just can’t recommend them. Please be careful. — Good fishing, Richard L. LaFay | (248) 753-6940 (work) 2887 Pontiac Court  | (248) 373-6865 (home) Auburn Hills, Michigan   48326 Ranger Boats, Lowrance Electronics, Berkley Trilene, Rippler, Bill Norman Lures, and Aqua-Vu underwater cameras. I use them because I think they’re the best!

    Response:

    Try Bob’s Machine Shop’s. I have one and it’s works great — Chuck Coger

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I`m looking for a good manual jackplate for my 1988 Ranger360-v I`m > trying to get better hole-shots and top end speed.what do you guys think > I should buy?

    Response:

    CMC Manual Jackplate-$200.00. Had it on the last 2 boats and still OK.

    Response:

    Your scaring me Rick. I have a manual Jackplate. What seems to be the weak link on them. I’m now curious, as I’ve never had problem one (knock on wood)… — Chuck Coger

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I`m looking for a good manual jackplate for my 1988 Ranger360-v I`m > trying to get better hole-shots and top end speed.what do you guys think > I should buy? > Bucky, >    I personally don’t like jackplates. A lot of folks run them but it seems > I am always seeing someone with one broken. I talked with one guy in Memphis > who told me of his jackplate breaking and his engine came off at wide open. > The engine was being held by only the cables and it circled above him 3 > times before it finally went in the drink. Not a picture I like to think of. > Every tournament I go to someone has a jackplate being fixed. I just can’t > recommend them. > Please be careful. > — > Good fishing, > Richard L. LaFay | (248) 753-6940 (work) > 2887 Pontiac Court  | (248) 373-6865 (home) > Auburn Hills, Michigan   48326 > Ranger Boats, Lowrance Electronics, Berkley Trilene, Rippler, > Bill Norman Lures, and Aqua-Vu underwater cameras. > I use them because I think they’re the best!

    Response:

    That’s kind of like saying you won’t use an electric motor because there’s always somebody with one broken. I have not had a hp bass boat withut at least a manual jack plate since 1982, and a power jack plate since 1989, and have never had one malfunction. Furthermore, since switching to one, I would never again buy a high performance bass boat without a power jackplate. I’ve seen a boat lose its motor directly off the transom, with no jackplate involved, too. RichZ


  • Ray Scott ?

    Question:

    Well i hate to admit this but. . . I never did get the scoop about why Scott sold out of BASS and moved on. And or why he is no longer endorsing Ranger? Did it have something to do with the FLW tour.. he n Forrest havin a snit? Just wondering as I read new Bassmasters mag and ran across the Triton Ad with good ole Ray talking about the BEST BASS FISHING BOAT ever… <grin> Don’t ya just love these guys?     Reading product reviews (for current n potential advertisers) in Bassmasters is like Ghengis Kahn (sp) extoling the virtues of dimplomacy isn’t it? — Josh  <The badbear>

    Response:

    Just a very few years ago, Ray came up to Illinois to the IL BASS Federation convention.  He gave a wonderful speech.  He is a natural born salesman.  I mean this in the best possible manner!  I wish I could put into words what he was saying.  He does have a recent book which would probably be well worth reading.  He has a way of speaking that can motivate folks.  I am sure that he is still the best of friends with all those who have been in the industry for a long time, regardless of the advertising.  Knowing that things change, there may have been those that have a different vision of the future and Ray may simply have stepped aside.  Which gives him time to do some other things which he has a passion for.  If you get a chance to hear him speak, do so.  You will never regret it. Carlos

    Response:

    > Well i hate to admit this but. . . I never did get the scoop about why Scott > sold out of BASS and moved on.

    Well my guess is he wanted too much money. Just a guess but I do know Ray. > And or why he is no longer endorsing Ranger? > Did it have something to do with the FLW tour.. he n Forrest havin a snit?

    No I don’t think so. Forrest is one of those guys you just have to love. However I believe that Earl Benz, the owner of Triton, made Ray a deal he couldn’t refuse. Earl very badly wants to dominate the market. > Just wondering as I read new Bassmasters mag and ran across the Triton Ad > with good ole Ray talking about the BEST BASS FISHING BOAT ever… <grin> > Don’t ya just love these guys? >     Reading product reviews (for current n potential advertisers) in > Bassmasters is like Ghengis Kahn (sp) extoling the virtues of dimplomacy > isn’t it?

    – Good fishing, Richard L. LaFay | (248) 753-6940 (work) 2887 Pontiac Court  | (248) 373-6865 (home) Auburn Hills, Michigan   48326 Ranger Boats, Lowrance Electronics, Berkley Trilene, Rippler, Bill Norman Lures, and Aqua-Vu underwater cameras. I use them because I think they’re the best!

    Response:

    >ubject: Ray Scott ? >Well i hate to admit this but. . . I never did get the scoop about why Scott >sold out of BASS and moved on.

    Umm, Josh, and every one else who thinks that Ray Scott is some sort of fishing savior.   I’m not gonna slam the guy personally, but facts are facts and let’s review.   He sold out.  Period, end of story.  Helen and company made him an offer he "couldn’t refuse"  eight figures to be precise.  Hell I’d bolt too.  Scott was in it for one reason, the cash. Putting on a good show was just part of the deal.  And put on a good show he did. Buddies with Forrest Wood?  Get straight outta town, Forrest Wood hasn’t had anything to do with boat building for ten years.  It’s all a show boys, all a show.   Wanna get mad and flame me?  Go right ahead, but I’d suggest you do a little research first.  Ranger is a division of GenMar, which owns eleven or twelve boat companies.  Scott does boat comercials for a <small> fee.  

    Response:

    <snip> > If you get a chance to hear > him speak, do so.  You will never regret it. > Carlos

    Ok I have to tell you the story of when I first met Ray Scott. It was at the Top 100 (in those days) tournament on Lake St. Clair in 95 I think. I was fishing the back seat. Anyway at the end of the first day of fishing they had a barbeque for all contestants. I went and loaded up a plate and looked around for someplace to sit. I ended up sitting at a table just down from Ray. He was talking and jabbering on. You know Ray. I  spoke up and commented on how he had made this big speech the other night about Mark Davis losing over a 100 pounds. I told him that I had lost a 145 myself. Ray looked at me and asked Well how did you do that. I replied I divorced her! He laughed like heck. After I finished eating he dragged me all over the place telling that joke. — Good fishing, Richard L. LaFay | (248) 753-6940 (work) 2887 Pontiac Court  | (248) 373-6865 (home) Auburn Hills, Michigan   48326 Ranger Boats, Lowrance Electronics, Berkley Trilene, Rippler, Bill Norman Lures, and Aqua-Vu underwater cameras. I use them because I think they’re the best!

    Response:

    <snip> > Umm, Josh, and every one else who thinks that Ray Scott is some sort of fishing > savior. > I’m not gonna slam the guy personally, but facts are facts and let’s review. > He sold out.  Period, end of story.  Helen and company made him an offer he > "couldn’t refuse"  eight figures to be precise.  Hell I’d bolt too.  Scott was > in it for one reason, the cash. Putting on a good show was just part of the > deal.  And put on a good show he did.

    Yes Ray is a very good talker. I agree here. > Buddies with Forrest Wood?  Get straight outta town, Forrest Wood hasn’t had > anything to do with boat building for ten years.  It’s all a show boys, all a > show.

    Now I have to take issue with you. I am at the factory a few times a year and Forrest or Nina are usually there. I think it is his son that practically runs the place. There are several other relatives that work there too. Oh and if you want to see a factory full of people that love working. Stop by. Everyone there LOVES that place. I have worked in GM factories all my life and I go to many other factories that build us parts and I have never seen a workforce that loves their job so much as those guys at Ranger. > Wanna get mad and flame me?  Go right ahead, but I’d suggest you do a little > research first.  Ranger is a division of GenMar, which owns eleven or twelve > boat companies.  Scott does boat comercials for a <small> fee.

    Yep Forrest sold out several years ago to Irwin Jacobs at GenMar. I know Irwin too. But you best believe they listen very intently (Irwin too) when Forrest speaks. I don’t know the capacity that Forrest has in the company now but I know they still take his advice. It is like one big family down there. — Good fishing, Richard L. LaFay | (248) 753-6940 (work) 2887 Pontiac Court  | (248) 373-6865 (home) Auburn Hills, Michigan   48326 Ranger Boats, Lowrance Electronics, Berkley Trilene, Rippler, Bill Norman Lures, and Aqua-Vu underwater cameras. I use them because I think they’re the best!

    Response:

    Have you ever added up all the weight that you’ve lost. 3 X ? = ? <VBGrin> – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > <snip> > If you get a chance to hear > him speak, do so.  You will never regret it. > Carlos > Ok I have to tell you the story of when I first met Ray Scott. It was at the > Top 100 (in those days) tournament on Lake St. Clair in 95 I think. I was > fishing the back seat. Anyway at the end of the first day of fishing they > had a barbeque for all contestants. I went and loaded up a plate and looked > around for someplace to sit. I ended up sitting at a table just down from > Ray. He was talking and jabbering on. You know Ray. > I  spoke up and commented on how he had made this big speech the other night > about Mark Davis losing over a 100 pounds. I told him that I had lost a 145 > myself. Ray looked at me and asked Well how did you do that. I replied I > divorced her! He laughed like heck. > After I finished eating he dragged me all over the place telling that joke. > — > Good fishing, > Richard L. LaFay | (248) 753-6940 (work) > 2887 Pontiac Court  | (248) 373-6865 (home) > Auburn Hills, Michigan   48326 > Ranger Boats, Lowrance Electronics, Berkley Trilene, Rippler, > Bill Norman Lures, and Aqua-Vu underwater cameras. > I use them because I think they’re the best!

    Response:

    Ray sold BASS 15 years ago! Forrest Wood sold Ranger 8 years ago. Ray continued to work for BASS until 3 years ago. When his contract was up for renewal, he wanted the right to endorse positions/products on his own. BASS didn’t want him to. They parted company. He signed on with Triton shortly thereafter. Forrest is still under contract to Ranger, but he has nothing to do with running the company. RichZ


  • Here's Wat I Found !!!!!!!!!!

    Question:

        Well its cold as hell; I’m up to my ass in snow and the wind chill is forty degrees below zero. And…. I ben thinking and stewin a little..but just a little…and here’s what about.     Lots of boys n girls are STILL all excited (fussin) that the BassMasters Classic held in Chicago this year didn’t produce buckets of fish… big big..fish..! So having nothing better to do and having icicles hanging from places they shouldhn’t be… I did a little research…. and… here’s what i found ….     I went to the B.A.S.S. home page and I counted tourney results reported. There were 14 tournaments reported from all over the country…invitational and Top 150 types. There were both 3 day and 4 day tournaments. If ya toss out the high total weight and the low total weight the average winning total weight for all of the tournaments posted was… 32 lbs.     Now …. the classic total 3 day winning weight was 27 lbs 13 ounces (almost 28  lbs) . . . so whatz tha beef? Is it just because the Classic was not down home in Southern waters? Is it because the guys who ran the Classic made the stupid mistake of choosing a 67,000 seat stadium to put 18,000 people in? Could it be that the same guys did a horse crap job of media education/media support? What’s tha deal?     In any event no one is going to suggest that this years Classic waters compare to some impoundments in other parts of the country…but I will say there are a lot of us regional boys that bounce up n down on that big pond Lake Michigan every weekend w/o crying about it. I think most of the pros found the venue challenging, if not the most picturesque, but to suggest that it was ludicrous to hold the Classic in Chicago or that it should never come back smacks of self centered, unfounded  elitism.  an an ….frankly I along with a number of regional guys are sick of hearing about it. That’s what i found anyway.  Tight lines guys/gals. — Josh <badbear>

    Response:

    >> Is it because the guys who ran the Classic > made the stupid mistake of choosing a 67,000 seat stadium to put > 18,000 people in?

    The actual crowd on the final day was more like 9,000 people than 18,000. The total attendance at the outdoor show wasn’t a third of   what it had been for the past couple years. That’s the reason that Chicago wasn’t well received int he industry. The Classic is often in a plasce where the fishing is poor, simply because it must be tied to a big city for the outdoor show and weigh-in. Need a convention center and coliseum for that. But if the locale kills the success of the outdoor show and the crowds don’t materialize for the weigh-in, then the venue isn’t really suitable. RichZ


  • fishing fundamentals

    Question:

    Wouldn’t surprise me a bit if Al was in Alice’s clothes right now…    Shawn

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hey, you reckon Al could fill in for Alice on the modeling job? > — >    Go Fishing.  And may your fish be as big as your tales. >    Columbia, SC  Lake Murray > >I > >checked further into the modelling assignment they said they were only > >looking > >for flat chested females > >Alice > Oh Al, your killing me. ROFLMAO > — > Why is it called "Common Sense", when so few have it? > Good Fishing – Moe > Moe’s Guide Service (Lake Okeechobee) – > http://members.aol.com/moefran/index.html > To view or post newsgroup ROBF Photos > http://members.aol.com/recbass/robf_index.html

    Response:

    >Wouldn’t surprise me a bit if Al was in Alice’s clothes right now… >   Shawn

    Shawn What’s happened you seemed previously to be the more moderate  spokesman of the group. Lighten up man. Al

    Response:

    > >Wouldn’t surprise me a bit if Al was in Alice’s clothes right now… >   Shawn > Shawn > What’s happened you seemed previously to be the more moderate  spokesman of the > group. Lighten up man. > Al

    Al, you’re that guy that’s found The Pattern. Us fish just can’t help ourselves. — So it goes.

    Response:

    >I >checked further into the modelling assignment they said they were only >looking >for flat chested females >Alice

    Oh Al, your killing me. ROFLMAO — Why is it called "Common Sense", when so few have it? Good Fishing – Moe Moe’s Guide Service (Lake Okeechobee) – http://members.aol.com/moefran/index.html To view or post newsgroup ROBF Photos http://members.aol.com/recbass/robf_index.html

    Response:

    Hey, you reckon Al could fill in for Alice on the modeling job? —    Go Fishing.  And may your fish be as big as your tales.    Columbia, SC  Lake Murray

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I >checked further into the modelling assignment they said they were only >looking >for flat chested females >Alice > Oh Al, your killing me. ROFLMAO > — > Why is it called "Common Sense", when so few have it? > Good Fishing – Moe > Moe’s Guide Service (Lake Okeechobee) – > http://members.aol.com/moefran/index.html > To view or post newsgroup ROBF Photos > http://members.aol.com/recbass/robf_index.html

    Response:

    Thanks for the help everyone. I had a little bit of a disappointment when I checked further into the modelling assignment they said they were only looking for flat chested females. They said it was on account of the bulky lifejackets that had to be worn. I’m still interested in fishing so I’ll continue with the newsgroup. Alice

    Response:

    >If this ain’t a Troll, then she must surely be confused. Laughingly we in >this group are supposed to be ardent bass fishing people, >yet with the exception of John McCabe ; the >advice given was drivel !

    He’s Baaack!!!  :) —

    Response:

    Is this really happening ? Am I awake yet ? Al I hope you and Alice meet up and fall in love. You two sound as if you’re made for each other…maybe you could take up photography to compliment her modeling ?! You could take pictures of her at Wal Mart modeling different attire and sporting equipment at virtually no cost ! Man oh man….are you real, or a figment of someone’s imagination to keep things stirred up around here ? Sure got me thinking….:) Shawn

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Alice > If you live anywhere near me I’ll be glad to help you with regard to a proper > realistic way of holding a fishing rod for your audition. We could meet at Taco > Bell and there is a Walmart close by with an ample supply of preassembled rods > and reels > Al

    Response:

    >Al I hope you and Alice meet up and fall in love. >Shawn

    Shawn, you missed it – Al and Alice are one and the same, both have aol accounts without profiles. Heck he can have up to seven different screen names on aol and thousands more with the free services. If you will notice in her post and his response, 1) she/he never stated the area they were from yet Al knew it was Canada? 2) he couldn’t figure out how to respond back to himself. What a troll this guy is! It really is pitifull if you think about it. — Why is it called "Common Sense", when so few have it? Good Fishing – Moe Moe’s Guide Service (Lake Okeechobee) – http://members.aol.com/moefran/index.html To view or post newsgroup ROBF Photos http://members.aol.com/recbass/robf_index.html

    Response:

    "Moe Conway"  wrote > Shawn, you missed it –

    ….got me hook, line & sinker didn’t he…so much for logging on before the coffee’s done brewing. — Early to Bed, Early to Rise…    Fish all Day, Make up Lies.    Shawn

    Response:

    Al >Alice >If you live anywhere near me I’ll be glad to help you with regard to a proper >realistic way of holding a fishing rod for your audition. We could meet at >Taco >Bell and there is a Walmart close by with an ample supply of preassembled >rods >and reels >Al

    Al Thank you for the invite. I did say Canadian periodicals so your right in assuming that I am from Canada (to the group) like yourself. Taco Bell and Walmart are a great idea. Seems to be a challenge from the group about us getting together thats why I am posting this. Al from your e mails I like your stated professional background and your knowledge of fishing. Alice

    Response:

    This is getting out of hand ,Al if you are that hard up for company I suggest your local red light district. Otherwise this NG is not the place for such B.S. — ~~~~ The RodMaker (aka) The Shadow

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Al >Alice >If you live anywhere near me I’ll be glad to help you with regard to a proper >realistic way of holding a fishing rod for your audition. We could meet at >Taco >Bell and there is a Walmart close by with an ample supply of preassembled >rods >and reels >Al > Al > Thank you for the invite. I did say Canadian periodicals so your right in > assuming that I am from Canada (to the group) like yourself. Taco Bell and > Walmart are a great idea. Seems to be a challenge from the group about us > getting together thats why I am posting this. Al from your e mails I like your > stated professional background and your knowledge of fishing. > Alice

    Response:

    >This is getting out of hand ,Al if you are that >hard up for company I suggest your local >red light district. Otherwise this NG is not the >place for such B.S. >(aka) The Shadow

    Come on Shad, lighten up. I want to see if he can arrange a date with himself. After all a man of his "professional background" and "fishing knowledge" has so little time to look for love elsewhere. Perhaps his time in the custody of those CO’s was more traumatic than we can appreciate. Is there a doctor in the house? :-) — Why is it called "Common Sense", when so few have it? Good Fishing – Moe Moe’s Guide Service (Lake Okeechobee) – http://members.aol.com/moefran/index.html To view or post newsgroup ROBF Photos http://members.aol.com/recbass/robf_index.html

    Response:

    Duh? Is there only one Taco Bell and one Walmart in the entire land mass of Canada? Somehow, "meet me at the Taco Bell near Walmart in Canada" doesn’t sound like very accurate directions. RichZ


  • Congratulations Rob!!!

    Question:

    Notice that the majority of those postings you quoted were not posted by me, but about me. I’m not looking to win a popularity contest, I’m more interested in support. -Rob

    Just out of curiosity I went to Deja.com and put your name in a search. I think I can safely say you are tonight’s winner in the "I am full of hot air , egomaniac of the week category" Here are the results: DISCUSSIONS SEARCH Power Search Results for: "rob wilkens" Search Deja.com products for rob wilkens Books,  Music,  Video,  Auctions! Find products relating to ROB WILKENS on Amazon.com. Messages 1-25 of 1256 matches Page 1 of 51 Next >> Date Subject Forum Author 03/20/2000Re: rob wilkens alt.support.depressiovyper 03/20/2000Re: FWD: RE: Rob Wilkens alt.support.depressiovyper 03/23/2000Re: Rob Wilkens alt.support.depressioStevo 03/23/2000Re: Rob Wilkens alt.support.depressioRob Wilkens 03/23/2000Re: Rob Wilkens alt.support.depressioRob Wilkens 03/23/2000Re: Rob Wilkens – go away! alt.support.depressioAtlanta Songbir03/20/2000Re: Rob Wilkens alt.support.depressioVesterback 03/23/2000Re: Rob Wilkens alt.support.depressioMoonGoddess 03/23/2000Re: Confusion alt.support.depressioQuestion mark 03/22/2000Re: Rob Wilkens alt.support.depressioThe North & Sou03/21/2000Re: Rob Wilkens soc.support.depressioRob Wilkens 03/21/2000Re: Rob Wilkens (was: Name c alt.support.depressioTerri Warner 03/18/2000Re: Rob Wilkens alt.support.depressioChief 03/17/2000Re: Rob Wilkens alt.support.depressioRob Wilkens 03/17/2000Re: Rob Wilkens alt.support.depressioRob Wilkens 03/20/2000Re: FWD: RE: Rob Wilkens alt.support.depressioRobert 03/20/2000rob wilkens? who gives a shi alt.support.depressiovyper 03/19/2000Re: to all re rob wilkens alt.support.depressiofrank buccacci 03/19/2000Re: to all re rob wilkens alt.support.depressioThe North & Sou03/19/2000Rob Wilkens soc.support.depressioTim 03/19/2000RE: Rob Wilkens alt.support.depressioLinda Channell 03/19/2000Re: Rob Wilkens alt.support.depressioRobert 03/17/2000Re: Rob Wilkens alt.support.depressioChief 03/17/2000Re: Time to take action abou alt.support.depressioDaric Priest 03/16/2000Re: Arrgh! Please ignore Rob alt.support.depressioRob Wilkens 1-25 of 1256 matches Page 1 of 51 Next >> Deja Linkback: Create a custom link to these search results from your own Web site Search Discussions For a more detailed search in Discussions go to Power Search  Search for: Search in archive  Copyright


  • how to teach letting go of things in mouth?

    Question:

    Hello everyone!  I’m hoping someone might know how to teach a dog to let go of an object that he has in his mouth.  My  puppy (7 months) loves to play catch, and he does an excellent job of bringing stuff back to me, but he wants to have a tug of war with me when  he comes back.  He’s a big dog (60 pounds) and I believe his mouth is too strong for me to open it.  Is there some standard way of doing this? Thanks for your help! – Mary

    Response:

    >Hello everyone!  I’m hoping someone might know how to teach a dog to >let go of an object that he has in his mouth.  My  puppy (7 months) >loves to play catch, and he does an excellent job of bringing stuff >back to me, but he wants to have a tug of war with me when  he comes >back.  He’s a big dog (60 pounds) and I believe his mouth is too >strong for me to open it.  Is there some standard way of doing this? >Thanks for your help!

    Mary, if you don’t want to get into all the formal techniques, which most folks don’t, just THROW something else for him to retrieve. He’ll likely DROP what he’s got in his mouth and run out to get it. — Dogman http://www.i1.net/~dogman

    Response:

    >Mary, if you don’t want to get into all the formal >techniques, which most folks don’t, just >THROW something else for him to retrieve. >He’ll likely DROP what he’s got in his mouth >and run out to get it. >– >Dogman

    Common sense isn’t around much these days. Somtimes an answer is just too simple,huh? Paulette~ A dogs life is too short…     Their only fault really…

    Response:

    A good way to get your dog to let go of the article is to offer a tasty treat. When the dog returns with it make him sit in front of you and offer the treat and give the command "GIVE". As soon as he lets go give him the treat and plenty of praise. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >Hello everyone!  I’m hoping someone might know how to teach a dog to >let go of an object that he has in his mouth.  My  puppy (7 months) >loves to play catch, and he does an excellent job of bringing stuff >back to me, but he wants to have a tug of war with me when  he comes >back.  He’s a big dog (60 pounds) and I believe his mouth is too >strong for me to open it.  Is there some standard way of doing this? >Thanks for your help! >- Mary

    Response:

    don ‘t fall into this trap. don’t throw a second item. it teaches the dog nothing about playing the "game" fairly. nothing worse than a retriever who

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Hello everyone!  I’m hoping someone might know how to teach a dog to >let go of an object that he has in his mouth.  My  puppy (7 months) >loves to play catch, and he does an excellent job of bringing stuff >back to me, but he wants to have a tug of war with me when  he comes >back.  He’s a big dog (60 pounds) and I believe his mouth is too >strong for me to open it.  Is there some standard way of doing this? >Thanks for your help! > Mary, if you don’t want to get into all the formal techniques, which > most folks don’t, just THROW something else for him to retrieve. > He’ll likely DROP what he’s got in his mouth and run out to get it. > — > Dogman > http://www.i1.net/~dogman

    Response:

    I just wait (the very first time) untill the dog drops it.  Then I reward and go again, it takes just a couple of times. At some point in the future the dog will what to see what happens if it keeps it. The first time I will wait give the dog a correction. The next time end the game. No game without playing by the rules. Once a dog has learned to play the game with keeping it I would get someone else to retrain fetch give yourself a break from the activity. Come back to it when it has the drop "down".  There are lot of other things I bet you can work on. You will get a great deal of good advice from many people so read them all and carfully choose a route. If is much better to never let them start (not even once) these types of little beh’s. dw – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hello everyone!  I’m hoping someone might know how to teach a dog to > let go of an object that he has in his mouth.  My  puppy (7 months) > loves to play catch, and he does an excellent job of bringing stuff > back to me, but he wants to have a tug of war with me when  he comes > back.  He’s a big dog (60 pounds) and I believe his mouth is too > strong for me to open it.  Is there some standard way of doing this? > Thanks for your help! > – Mary

    Response:

    Dogman writes: >Mary, if you don’t want to get into all the formal >techniques, which most folks don’t, just >THROW something else for him to retrieve. >He’ll likely DROP what he’s got in his mouth >and run out to get it.

    I use this one a lot at the shelter. You can teach some dogs to drop on command by first throwing something, then holding the object to be thrown out and throwing only after a "drop" (with praise, of course), then holding the object out, getting the dog to drop, praise, then grab the DROPPED item to throw, and so on. For other dogs, the second object technique never got past phase one or two. JohnR Pit Bull Libertarian

    Response:

    Marc Kortlander writes:

    :You are absolutely 100% correct. all :you are doing when trading one object :for another is reenforcing unwanted :behavior. Tell it to the dogs I trained to drop on command by using this technique. JohnR Pit Bull Libertarian

    Response:

    pmg writes:

    :don ‘t fall into this trap. don’t throw a second :item. it teaches the dog :nothing about playing the "game" fairly. :nothing worse than a retriever who As I just posted, SOME dogs can learn to drop on command by starting with the second object technique and stretching it out from there. With others, it’s just a useful failsafe. The technique itself can’t wreck a dog, though I suppose one could get lazy about moving the dog along. But it’s used on dogs that ALREADY don’t "share". JohnR Pit Bull Libertarian

    Response:

    > Mary, if you don’t want to get into all the formal techniques, which > most folks don’t, just THROW something else for him to retrieve. > He’ll likely DROP what he’s got in his mouth and run out to get it.

    Unless he’s a Golden.  Then he’ll probably try to stuff both objects in his mouth. M.

    Response:

    >don ‘t fall into this trap. don’t throw a second item. it teaches the dog >nothing about playing the "game" fairly. nothing worse than a retriever who

    What "trap," pmg? This dog is only 7 months old…he’ll eventually learn how to "share." This lady probably just wants a quick way to get her pup to release an object currently in its mouth — which this is. The pup will also learn that it doesn’t get another object to retrieve unless it *drops* the one in its mouth — which is a start in the right direction, eh? I’ve only been training retrievers for close to four decades now, and have never had a retriever fall into any "traps" by throwing a second object. Geeeeeeeeez. Buy the way, pmg, why didn’t you tell the lady how she SHOULD do it? Huh? :>( [...] > >Hello everyone!  I’m hoping someone might know how to teach a dog to > >let go of an object that he has in his mouth.  My  puppy (7 months) > >loves to play catch, and he does an excellent job of bringing stuff > >back to me, but he wants to have a tug of war with me when  he comes > >back.  He’s a big dog (60 pounds) and I believe his mouth is too > >strong for me to open it.  Is there some standard way of doing this? > >Thanks for your help! > Mary, if you don’t want to get into all the formal techniques, which > most folks don’t, just THROW something else for him to retrieve. > He’ll likely DROP what he’s got in his mouth and run out to get it.

    – Dogman http://www.i1.net/~dogman

    Response:

    >>don ‘t fall into this trap. don’t throw a second item. it teaches the dog >nothing about playing the "game" fairly. nothing worse than a retriever who >You are absolutely 100% correct. all you are doing when trading one >object for another is reenforcing unwanted behavior.

    Unfreakingbelieveable. You are even dumber than I thought. Specifically which "unwanted behavior" are you reinforcing by throwing another object to retrieve?????? Huh? And you’re not "trading" anything here, you’re just giving the dog another object to RETRIEVE. And he’ll be forced to use his BRAIN then to figure out that he can’t retrieve the second object unless he RELEASES the first one. And that’s exactly what we want him to do. Even the dog can figure this one out, why can’t you, Kortlander? >It is better to >train the dog to "drop it" or what I use, "spit it out" that way >ANYTHING inappropriate that winds up in the dogs mouth can be spat out >on command.

    Geeeeeeeez.  Yes, it is always better to FORMALLY train the dog to retrieve, but most folks just don’t want to go through the bother. That’s why I gave this lady a "quick and dirty" way of getting over this little hump. And it’s *impossible* to make the situation any worse by simply throwing a second object for the dog. I-M-P-O-S-S-I-B-L-E. >If you train your dog to expect compensation for giving up >something in his mouth, you are looking at more troubles

    And just what "troubles" would those be, Mr. Retriever Trainer? Huh? >when he has something he shouldn’t in his mouth but won’t > give it up because you have nothing to trade.

    Do you know how STUPID that sounds to real dog trainers? It’s like saying a trainer who uses treats must ALWAYS use them to get their dog to do anything. Do you really believe that, Kortlander? Are you really that freakin’ STUPID? I’ll tell you what, Kortlander, how ’bout coming out to a field trial (or even a hunt test) and showing me what you got, eh? Besides having shit for brains, I mean. Huh? And then we can put some *real* money on the outcome, okay? Again, this wasn’t meant to be a formal technique for teaching a dog how to retrieve, release, etc.  It was intended as a "quick and dirty" method of getting a retriever past the "this is *my* ball" stage. Any retriever with half a brain will quickly figure out that it ALWAYS gets something else to retrieve if it drops the first object, negating the need to play keeps with the first one. In fact, most dogs will figure this out after only 3-4 tosses, and will even start to DROP the object at the thrower’s feet, anxiously awaiting the thrower to throw the second object. No, not all dogs, but MOST of them. And I have a hunch that this lady’s dog is one of them. So, Kortlander, why don’t we compare our training methods  by comparing our RESULTS? My dogs against yours, if you have any dogs, that is. Whaddya say? ;>) — Dogman http://www.i1.net/~dogman

    Response:

    >> Mary, if you don’t want to get into all the formal techniques, which > most folks don’t, just THROW something else for him to retrieve. > He’ll likely DROP what he’s got in his mouth and run out to get it. >Unless he’s a Golden.  Then he’ll probably try to stuff both objects in >his mouth.

    Unless he’s a really, really dumb GR, he won’t keep trying, eh? That is, he’ll figure it out pretty quick. If he doesn’t, Mary, he probably shouldn’t be allowed to pass his genes along, eh? ;>) — Dogman http://www.i1.net/~dogman

    Response:

    >pmg writes: >:don ‘t fall into this trap. don’t throw a second :item. it teaches the dog >:nothing about playing the "game" fairly. :nothing worse than a retriever who >As I just posted, SOME dogs can learn to >drop on command by starting with the >second object technique and stretching >it out from there. With others, it’s just >a useful failsafe. The technique itself can’t >wreck a dog, though I suppose one could >get lazy about moving the dog along. But >it’s used on dogs that ALREADY don’t >"share".

    John, what is it about this method that only you and I appear to understand? Is it that baffling? Was I speaking in tongues? What? Geeeeeeez. — Dogman http://www.i1.net/~dogman

    Response:

    >>Mary, if you don’t want to get into all the formal >techniques, which most folks don’t, just >THROW something else for him to retrieve. >He’ll likely DROP what he’s got in his mouth >and run out to get it.

    [...] >Common sense isn’t around much these days. >Somtimes an answer is just too simple,huh?

    Apparently this was over the heads of at least two, eh? Geeeeeeeeeeeee. — Dogman http://www.i1.net/~dogman

    Response:

    >pmg writes: >:don ‘t fall into this trap. don’t throw a >:second :item. it teaches the dog >:nothing about playing the "game" fairly. >:nothing worse than a retriever who

    I replied: >As I just posted, SOME dogs can learn to >drop on command by starting with the >second object technique and stretching >it out from there. With others, it’s just >a useful failsafe. The technique itself can’t >wreck a dog, though I suppose one could >get lazy about moving the dog along. But >it’s used on dogs that ALREADY don’t >"share".

    Dogman replies: :John, what is it about this method that :o nly you and I appear to understand? Beats me. You post with some some, useful, informative advice that the original inquirer could put into practice in about two seconds flat, and out come the flame throwers. This is one for the record books. Oh yeah, this technique helped to save the day when, unbeknownst to me, some idjit at the shelter had turned one of our better Pit Bulls into a leash aggressive tug-o-maniac. Never sneer at the power of a little pink squeaky toy. JohnR Pit Bull Libertarian

    Response:

    Marc Kortlander misinformed with: >:You are absolutely 100% correct. all >:you are doing when trading one object >:for another is reenforcing unwanted >:behavior.

    I corrected him with: >Tell it to the dogs I trained to drop on >command by using this technique.

    MK again: :what other mute animals do you have :discussions with? Ah, such a sly wit. JohnR Pit Bull Libertarian

    Response:

    Careful John Doe with your criticisms, because most "dog experts" will tell you to use hard consonants, and as few words as possible with voice commands.  Therefore, your use of "spit it out" is incorrect vis-a-vis "drop it."   Pussyman isn’t alone, I guess. * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet’s Discussion Network * The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet – Free!

    Response:

    >Never sneer at the power >of a little pink squeaky toy.

    Cindy Tittle Moore replies: :Now there’s sig material… You know what? You’re right! JohnR Pit Bull Libertarian Never sneer at the power of a little pink squeaky toy!

    Response:

    >>Careful John Doe with your criticisms, because most "dog >experts" will tell you to use hard consonants, and as few >words as possible with voice commands.  Therefore, your use >of "spit it out" is incorrect vis-a-vis "drop it."   >Pussyman isn’t alone, I guess. >spit it out works fine for me, that might be contrary to so called >expert opinions, but I’ve always found to go with what works for me. >The point is not the actual verbiage of the command is not the issue, >but that teaching the dog that a trade is necessary for him to release >something that shouldn’t be in his mouth is IMHO bad training.

    Yo, stupido! You’re not "trading" anything here, you’re just tossing another freakin’ dummy (toy, ball, etc.)! >when my >dog, like most retrievers do,  picks up something in her mouth that >she shouldn’t have in her mouth I want an immediate release, no >trading, no questions asked, just spit it out.

    No shit, Red Ryder? That’s what we all want, of course, even this lady, but the TRICK is to actually GET TO THAT POINT, isn’t it? And I gave this lady a "quick and dirty" way to get over her immediate problem. To this point, however, *you* haven’t told this poor lady HOW to do anything, all you’ve done is take nips at *my* ankles, like some crazed little peke-a-poo. Damn, you’re a *stupid* little troll… Geeeeeeez. — Dogman http://www.i1.net/~dogman

    Response:

    >Hello everyone!  I’m hoping someone might know how to teach a dog to >let go of an object that he has in his mouth.  My  puppy (7 months) >loves to play catch, and he does an excellent job of bringing stuff >back to me, but he wants to have a tug of war with me when  he comes >back.  He’s a big dog (60 pounds) and I believe his mouth is too >strong for me to open it.  Is there some standard way of doing this? >Thanks for your help! >- Mary

    Hello Mary, I know what your dog is up to because mine does the same thing…or did.  He still does with my son.  When he brings back the football he wants to play keep-a-way.  The fun for him is in being chased, not the running after the ball and bringing it back. With my son, he plays run-a-round for hours. The winner is the one that gets to keep the ball.  With my wife, he will drop the ball on the command "OUT", then he will pick it up and run around some more or play tug-o-war.  With me he will drop it on the command OUT and then LEAVE IT and wait for me to throw it again. Why the difference?  That’s the way they/we all trained him.   If you want him to drop the ball when you say "OUT" or "DROP" and leave it on the ground.  Teach him the sit/stay, and when he comes running up with the ball, tell him to sit/stay.  Then walk over and say "out" and take the ball out of his mouth. You can practice the "out" indoors as well by just giving him something to hold (a chewy stick, ball, etc.) and saying "out" while taking it back.  Or…and this is more devious, give it to him and when you see he is about to drop it, say "out".  Then when he starts to pick it back up say "LEAVE IT" and *you* pick it up first. Be sure to give lots of praise when he does it right.  Be sure also not to give him a hard time when he does it wrong.  He may not bring it back Also remember he is a puppy and will act like a puppy….for a long time if you are lucky.  Be patient. Good luck! Robert

    Response:

    >Hello everyone!  I’m hoping someone might know how to teach a dog to >let go of an object that he has in his mouth.  My  puppy (7 months) >loves to play catch, and he does an excellent job of bringing stuff >back to me, but he wants to have a tug of war with me when  he comes >back.  He’s a big dog (60 pounds) and I believe his mouth is too >strong for me to open it.  Is there some standard way of doing this? >Thanks for your help! >- Mary

    Mary – bet you didn’t know this would turn into a bash fest, did you? A simple question and [some] sensible answers.  Here’s what *I* would do. Since the dog willingly comes back and let’s you touch the object in his mouth (as opposed to a dog who plays "keep away"), I would go with "SIT – GIVE", and use one or some of the following techniques:  grab the ball firmly, making sure your hand/fingers are BEHIND the ball, and "juts take it".  Stick your finger in his ear (honest!) or blow in his ear (not as easy depending on coordination).  Asking him to SIT everytime he returns gives you more control over the situation.  A REWARD (not a trade) of a SMALL food bit, for sitting and giving, can be used (make sure you have the object before rewarding) and the extension of the reward is another throw.  You can wean off the food reward over time.  Won’t give it up? Game’s over.   I personally think it’s good to teach dogs to drop ANYTHING when I ask. What is adequate praise for doing so will vary depending on the dog.  Play "give it" games when watching TV in the evenings (as opposed to only working on the issue when yuo’re out in the yard playing).  Once he learns that "give" is going to "get" him more, he’ll catch on. Janet Boss<BR> Best Friends Dog Obedience<BR> "Nice Manners for the Family Pet"<BR> <BR> "Second-hand dogs AREN’T second-rate"<BR> Filtered Bliss – AHH……<BR>

    Response:

    Janet Boss writes; :I personally think it’s good to teach dogs to :drop ANYTHING when I ask. I suppose that "stay" and "come" are the most important commands. But after these, I consider "drop" one of the real biggies. JohnR Pit Bull Libertarian Never sneer at the power of a little pink squeaky toy!

    Response:

    Trade.  Say "give" and hold up a treat.  When puppy drops object, reward him with praise and treat.  It will become natural shortly thereafter.

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Hello everyone!  I’m hoping someone might know how to teach a dog to >let go of an object that he has in his mouth.  My  puppy (7 months) >loves to play catch, and he does an excellent job of bringing stuff >back to me, but he wants to have a tug of war with me when  he comes >back.  He’s a big dog (60 pounds) and I believe his mouth is too >strong for me to open it.  Is there some standard way of doing this? >Thanks for your help! >- Mary

    Response:

    >>Hello everyone!  I’m hoping someone might know how to teach a dog to >let go of an object that he has in his mouth.  My  puppy (7 months) >loves to play catch, and he does an excellent job of bringing stuff >back to me, but he wants to have a tug of war with me when  he comes >back.  He’s a big dog (60 pounds) and I believe his mouth is too >strong for me to open it.  Is there some standard way of doing this? >Thanks for your help! >- Mary >Mary – bet you didn’t know this would turn into a bash fest, did you? >A simple question and [some] sensible answers.  Here’s what *I* would do.

    [...] Mary, Janet’s advice is also very good, and definitely works just as well. But if you want something even less formal (and more in line with my original recommendation), and virtually ALL PLAY, and extremely EASY to do, go here: http://www.dogzone.com/reading/retrieve.htm And it’s the site I probably should have referred you to in the first place, but I was in a hurry, yada yada yada. It’s a *very* good way for the novice dog trainer to teach the retrieve, and it eliminates virtually any possibility of making a mistake. For the novice trainer, who only wants to play with his dog, it’s just about perfect. And then, Mary, should you ever decide to **"go all the way," go here: http://www.dobbsdogs.com/library/retrievers/rjpart1.htm http://www.dobbsdogs.com/library/retrievers/rjpart2.htm **Forget about these if you’re not ever going to compete, etc. Anyway, I hope you really enjoy your new puppy! Stick around and learn a lot of other things to teach your puppy, too, Sometimes you can’t smell them ’til they’re right on top of you, but they’re always a dead giveaway when they open their mouths. ;>) — Dogman http://www.i1.net/~dogman

    Response: